Foreign Experience of Legal Counteraction to Illegal Enrichment: Conceptual Foundations

  • S. Cherniavskyi

    Doctor of Law, Professor, Vice-Rector of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2711-3828
  • A. Vozniuk

    Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Scientific Laboratory on Problems Counteracting of Crime of the Educational and Research Institute No. 1 of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-5626

Abstract

The purpose of the article is study the experience of foreign countries in applying various legal instruments counteract illegal enrichment in order to take into account its positive and negative aspects in formulating the conceptual foundations of the Ukrainian model of prosecution of chargeable officials for such a corruption offense. The article apply the concept of scientific methods,as follows: terminological, systemic-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. The theoretical basis for the study is the work of foreign scientists, the provisions of the UN Convention against Corruption, the legal norms used to counteract illegal enrichment, as well as the practice of their application in individual countries. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the fact that it discloses the positive and negative spectra the usage two models of legal counteraction to illegal enrichment. These are: 1) recognition of unclear enrichment as the crime and bringing the perpetrators to criminal responsibility; 2) the confiscation of property, the origin of which a person cannot explain, during so-called civil confiscation. In addition, proposals for their effective use in general and in Ukraine in particular are formulated. According to the results of the study, conclusions are drawn: 1) refusal to use the term «illegal enrichment» by replacing it with «unclear enrichment» or «inexplicable enrichment» when designing new instruments to counter illegal enrichment in Ukraine; 2) the identification of such models of legal counteraction to illegal enrichment, which nowadays have become the most widespread in the world: a) recognition of unclear enrichment as the crime and bringing the perpetrators to criminal responsibility; and b) confiscation of property whose origin cannot be explained during so-called civil confiscation; 3) the positive aspects of the use of the said legal instruments, which consist in the fact that they are: a) stimulate persons authorized to perform functions of the state or local self-government, to lawful conduct, primarily to refrain from committing corruption offenses; b) allow to remove illegally acquired assets and turn them into state revenue during the confiscation of property; c) contribute to the reduction of corruption in the state; d) testify to the fact that real steps to counteract corruption are being taken in Ukraine; 4) prospects of using these models in counteracting illegal enrichment in Ukraine.

Keywords: illegal enrichment; unclear wealth; confiscation; corruption; corruption crime; declaration; inaccurate information; organized crime; presumption of innocence; burden of proof.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

S. Cherniavskyi

Doctor of Law, Professor, Vice-Rector of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

A. Vozniuk

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Scientific Laboratory on Problems Counteracting of Crime of the Educational and Research Institute No. 1 of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine


Abstract views: 399
PDF Downloads: 310
Published
2019-09-25
How to Cite
[1]
Cherniavskyi , S. and Vozniuk , A. 2019. Foreign Experience of Legal Counteraction to Illegal Enrichment: Conceptual Foundations. Law Magazine of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 17, 1 (Sep. 2019), 79-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33270/04191701.79.
Section
International experience

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>