Problems of Attracting to Administrative Responsibility for Violation of Legislation Requirements, Construction Norms, Standards and Regulations for Construction
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the current practice of resolving administrative proceedings concerning the prosecution of offenses under Article 96 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine, namely for violations of the requirements of legislation, building codes, standards and rules during construction. The statistical data and the case law concerning the investigation of the category of administrative offenses are analyzed, the key forms of the objective side are highlighted, the classification of the most common types of violations occurring during the issuance and appeal of administrative offenses are proposed. The scientific novelty of the article is that it explores in detail the peculiarities of bringing to administrative responsibility precisely under Art. 96 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine and parts thereof, as the vast majority of studies address the issue of administrative liability in the context of Chapter 8 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Administrative Offenses in Construction, or in the context of a general investigation of offenses in the field of construction, violations of legislation construction activities, etc., ie encompassing Art. 96 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of Ukraine is only «tangible» in relation to the research topic. In addition, suggestions were made regarding the classification of the objective side of the investigated administrative offense. According to the results of the conducted research, conclusions were formulated and proposals were made on reforming the structural divisions of the State architectural and construction inspection, establishing qualification requirements for officials, delimiting the area of their activity and responsibility.
Keywords: administrative responsibility; sphere of construction; violation of building codes; the objective side; administrative proceedings; composition of an administrative offense.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Malak M. A. U., El-Saadi M. M. H. Claim-Avoidance Administrative Procedures for Construction Projects. Construction Congress. 2000. No. VI. doi: 10.1061/40475(278)63.
Ayari A. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Bahraini Construction Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility. 2019. P. 1020–1031. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6192-7.ch052.
Бєлікова О. В. Юридичний склад адміністративного правопорушення. Держава та регіони. 2013. № 2. С. 22–28. (Серія «Право»).
Bunni N. G. Risk and insurance in construction. Responsibility and liability in construction. 2nd ed. London ; New York : Spon Press, 2003. Р. 139–180. doi: 10.4324/9780203476543_chapter_5.
Колпаков В. К., Гордєєв В. В. Склад адміністративного проступку : лекція. Чернівці, 2011. 40 с.
Lewis J. R. Administrative Law for the Construction Industry. 1976. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-15711-2.
Loosemore M. Responsibility, power and construction conflict. Construction Management and Economics. 1999. No. 17 (6). P. 699–709. doi: 10.1080/014461999371042.
Mueller F. W. Administrative Prerequisites to Starting Construction. Integrated Cost and Schedule Control for Construction Projects. 1986. P. 334–343. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9750-6_21.
Murray M. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Construction Industry. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203012338.
Постанова Деснянського районного суду м. Києва від 18 червня 2013 року. Справа № 754/9712/13-а. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/31884305.
Постанова Деснянського районного суду м. Києва від 24 травня 2013 року. Справа № 754/5684/13-а. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/31405666.
Постанова Франківського районного суду м. Львова від 1 червня 2013 року. Справа № 465/1503/13-а. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/31839178.
Постанова Канівського міськрайонного суду Черкаської області від 22 вересня 2014 року. Справа № 697/2007/14-аЄ. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/40577442.
Постанова Комсомольського районного суду м. Херсона від 25 червня 2012 року. Справа № 2114/3053/12. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/26804076.
Постанова Кривоозерського районного суду Миколаївської області від 3 грудня 2019 року. Справа № 697/2007/14-аЄ. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86172711.
Постанова Одеського апеляційного адміністративного суду від 2 серпня 2018 року. Провадження № 821/225/18. Єдиний державний реєстр судових рішень : [сайт]. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75729071.
Статистична інформація щодо обсягу виробленої будівельної продукції та будівельних робіт. 2019. Державна служба статистики України : [сайт]. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Ziemele I. Responsibility in construction law. Administrative and Criminal Justice. 2017. No. 4 (81). Р. 36. doi: 10.17770/acj.v4i81.2845.
Abstract views: 3502 PDF Downloads: 378
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
