Correction and Resocialization of Sentences to Deprivation of Liberty in the System of Means of Execution of Tasks of Criminal-Executive Legislation
Abstract
Any sphere of legal regulation, in particular, the execution of criminal penalties, is necessarily based on fundamental constitutional principles, which are the basis for the development of relationships between the rule of law and the individual. These include such principles as: inseparability, inviolability and inviolability of the rights and freedoms of the individual; the rule of law; mutual responsibility of the state and the individual; limited and subordinate state power; strict obedience to the law in the activities of all state bodies and officials. Nowadays, the problems of observance of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens who find themselves in places of imprisonment are very acute. The purpose of the article there is a definition of the features of the correction and resocialization of prisoners sentenced to imprisonment in the system of means of fulfilling the tasks of criminal executive legislation. Methodology. In preparing the article, certain general scientific and special-scientific methods of cognition were used, in particular: historical, philosophical and legal, comparative, systemic, functional, generalization. Scientific novelty. As a result of an empirical study of the correction and resocialization of prisoners sentenced to imprisonment in the system of means of fulfilling the tasks of criminal executive legislation, the author’s interpretation of the concept of «resocialization of prisoners to imprisonment» is given, according to which this is a process of positive changes in the personality of a convict as a result of the application of legal, organizational, pedagogical, psychological, educational and other measures of influence in order to eliminate the negative value orientations of convicts, the consequences of their isolation, consolidation of the results of correction, rendering assistance to them after serving their sentence and promoting their adaptation in the social environment. It has been proven that when determining the type of institutions for the execution of punishments, the criterion of openness / closeness of these institutions is advisable to apply only in institutions of execution of punishment in the form of imprisonment. The above conclusions deepen knowledge about the object of research, contribute to the study of the process of execution and serving of sentences by convicts. Conclusions. The criminal executive legislation of Ukraine regulates the procedure and conditions for the execution and serving of criminal sentences in order to protect the interests of the individual, society and the state by directing efforts to correct and re-socialize convicts, prevent the commission of new criminal offenses by both convicted persons and other persons, as well as prevent torture and inhuman or degrading treatment of convicts. The state respects and protects the rights, freedoms and legal interests of convicts, provides the necessary conditions for their correction and resocialization, social and legal protection and their personal security. The main tasks of the resocialization of convicts can be considered the restoration and expansion of their socially useful ties and relations with society, the development of an integral personality capable of an objective attitude both to the world around them and to oneself; change in the orientation of the personality; creation of a system of moral, ideological, legal convictions in accordance with the norms and values accepted in society; the formation of persons serving a sentence, the ability to stable, independent, law-abiding behavior after serving a sentence.
Keywords: resocialization; regime of execution of punishment; imprisonment; sentenced to imprisonment; correctional colony; legal status; institutions of execution of punishments.
Downloads
References
Міжнародна кримінологія – проблемне поле міжнародних досліджень : матеріали наук.-практ. семінару / за заг. ред. В. Ф. Антипенка. Київ : Сталь, 2011. 236 с. doi: https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.22.6643.
Баранов Ю. В. Ресоциализация осужденных к лишению свободы и освобожденных от этого наказания: теоретико-методологические и правовые основы : автореф. дис ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.08. М., 2008. 19 c.
Дрьомін В. М. Еволюція покарання в контексті запобіжних можливостей: від позбавлення волі до умовного випробування. Актуальні проблеми держави і права. 2007. Вип. 32. С. 259–265.
Хорошун О. В. Деякі питання режиму виконання покарання та відбування кримінального покарання у виді довічного позбавлення волі. Вісник Запорізького національного університету. 2012. № 1 (ІІ). С. 257–261.
Колб О. Г. Запобігання злочинності у місцях позбавлення волі : навч. посіб. Луцьк : Вежа, 2005. 494 с.
Колесникова Н. Е. Социально-психологическая ресоциализация осужденных мужчин в исправительном учреждении : автореф. дис ... канд. психол. наук : 19.00.05. СПб., 2011. 24 с.
Крайнова Н. А. Проблемы ресоциализации неоднократно судимых лиц : автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.08. Владивосток, 2002. 23 с.
Наливайко В. С. Кримінологічні проблеми ресоціалізації осіб, звільнених з місць позбавлення волі : дис. ... канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.08. Київ, 2000. 142 с.
Осауленко О. І. Диференціація та індивідуалізація виконання кримінальних покарань у виді позбавлення волі. Проблеми пенітенціарної теорії і практики. 2002. № 7. С. 59–64.
Перинская Н. А. Ресоциализация. Знание. Понимание. Умение. 2005. № 4. С. 161–162.
Романюк О. В., Човган В. О. Міжнародні стандарти, принципи і рекомендації в галузі виконання покарань та діяльності органів і установ виконання покарань : метод. рек. Біла Церква, 2016. 131 с. URL: https://i-rc.org.ua/files/posibnik-mijnarodni-standarty.pdf. doi: https://doi.org/10.34015/2523-4552.2019.1.13.
Рыбак М. С. Ресоциализация осужденных к лишению свободы: проблемы теории и практики / под ред. В. П. Малкова. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. Саратов : СГАП, 2004. 480 с.
Стеблинська О. С., Ярмолюк О. В. Окремі питання втечі з місць позбавлення волі або з-під варти. Право. 2016. № 1 (13). С. 253–259.
Уфимцева Н. Ф. Особенности ресоциализации осужденных в пенитенциарных учреждениях Германии (на примере земли Нижняя Саксония). Социальная работа на Урале: исторический опыт и современность : межвуз. сб. науч. тр. Екатеринбург, 2003. Вып. 3. С. 231–248.
Зливко С. В., Ткаченко О. Г. Правовий режим в установах виконання покарань та слідчих ізоляторах як вид адміністративно-правового режиму. Право та управління. 2011. № 1. С. 172–178.
Abstract views: 486 PDF Downloads: 843
Copyright (c) 2021 Law Magazine of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.