DIGITAL GOVERNANCE IN URBAN PLANNING AS A TOOL FOR DECRIMINALIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
Abstract
Abstract. The article examines digital governance in urban planning as a potential instrument for the decriminalization of construction activities. The author argues that the introduction of electronic services such as the e-construction platform does not necessarily reduce offenses or enhance transparency if the regulatory framework itself is fragmented, contradictory, or legally unstable. Particular attention is paid to the phenomenon of digital latency-hidden forms of inaction that are not recorded in the systems but carry criminological significance. The paper reviews the regulatory architecture in land use and urban planning, identifying sources of legal uncertainty that prevent accountability or facilitate the obstruction of decisions. The concept of regulatory simulation is introduced, describing how digital systems may outwardly exhibit transparency while only recording procedural actions without legal outcomes. Although the e-construction platform is administered by a highly trusted institution (DIAM), it operates in an environment of normative reversals and limited interagency integration. A comparative analysis of digital services in Singapore, Estonia, the Netherlands, and Georgia reveals that key factors in their effectiveness include full registry integration, stability of law enforcement, mandatory audit trails, and automatic anomaly detection. The article offers recommendations for criminal and administrative legislation, including the introduction of the concept of "digital official misconduct," the establishment of permit irreversibility, and the algorithmization of criminological prevention. Conclusion: digitalization should be seen not merely as formal automation but as a tool for ensuring legal certainty and a new architecture of trust.
Keywords: digital governance; e-construction; legal certainty; digital latency; DIAM; urban development; decriminalization; regulatory simulation; institutional accountability; criminological prevention; administrative inaction.
Downloads
Abstract views: 65 PDF Downloads: 45
Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
