Object of Intentional Damage to Communications Lines (Article 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)

  • V. Babanina

    Ph.D in Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

  • O. Yurikov

    Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Criminal Law of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-6887

Abstract

With regard to absence of thorough researches of objects of intentional damage to communications lines in criminal law theory, the purpose of this article is to study the conceptual foundations of such objects’ structure and content. Considering the specifics of the topic, goals and outlined objectives, various general scientific, special-scientific and philosophical methods were used for an objective study of the subject and for formation of sound conclusions. Among them, in particular, systematic method was used in studying objects of intentional damage to communications lines; dogmatic method – to identify shortcomings and explore the possibilities for improving of structure of objects of the crime stipulated by Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; logical-semantic – in the process of in-depth study of categorical-conceptual apparatus concerning the objects of intentional damage to communications lines. In order to ensure the formation of new proposals (based on already existing in special literature) and with regard to definition of structure of objects of intentional damage to communications lines, a method of generalization was applied. Scientific novelty. Certain problems of objects of the crime stipulated by Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine have been studied. Unlike the activities of public authorities, local self-government bodies, and associations of citizens, intentional damage of communication lines does not involve the effectuation of organizational, administrative or administrative-economic functions; the purpose of this norm is to protect people when the subject commits a crime, in order to influence management relations. Therefore, the crimes of intentional damage of the communication lines do not coincide in the essence of public relations with other crimes, located in Chapter XV of the Special part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Therefore, it is advisable to place the norm about an intentional damage of communication lines in Chapter VI of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It is argued that the structural elements of the social relations of the generic object of the crime provided for in Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, belong to: 1) participants (individuals and legal entities, society and state); 2) the subject of relations (property as a whole and property relations); 3) social connection (providing participants with these property protection relationships in general and property relations). Conclusions. It is argued that necessary to amend the Criminal Code of Ukraine (namely to place the Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in Chapter VI of the Special part «Crimes against property» by supplementing the law on criminal liability with Art. 194-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). It is scientifically proven that the direct object of the crime under Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are public relations that provide protection of property as a whole and property relations. Direct main object of the crime stipulated by the Art. 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is public relations in the sphere of ensuring of private, collective and state proprietary rights (depending on victim); additional obligatory object of the crime under inquiry is public relations providing normal functioning of telecommunication networks and its elements; additional optional object of the crime under inquiry could be public relations ensuring continuous proving telecommunication services, state defensive capacity, normal functioning of emergency response and civil defense services etc.

Keywords: general object; generic object; direct object; classification of objects; damage; communications lines; crime; public relations; criminal legal norm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

V. Babanina

Ph.D in Law, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

O. Yurikov

Post-Graduate Student of the Department of Criminal Law of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Babanina, V. (2018). Definition of the Criminal Legislation and its Correlation with Criminal Law. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 4(109), 133-145. Retrieved from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/13994. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/011810904.

Babanina, V. (2018). Significance of Some Legal Principles at the Stage of Creation of Criminal Legislation. Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav, Law Magazine of National Academy of Internal Affairs, 2(16), 163-171. Retrieved from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/13729. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/04181602.

Belonosov, V.O. (2018). Pravovye problemy ugolovno-protsessualnogo zakonotvorchestva na sovremennom etape [Legal problems of criminal procedure legislation at the modern stage]. Pravovye problemy ukrepleniia rossiiskoy gosudarstvennosti, Legal issues of strengthening russian statehood, 79, 27-34. doi: 10.17223/9785946217637/3 [in Russian].

Beshukova, Z.M. (2016). K voprosu o poniatii mekhanizma ugolovno-pravovogo protivodeistviia ekstremistskoy deiatelnosti [To a question of the concept of the mechanism of criminal law counteracting extremist activity]. Natsionalnaia bezopasnost, National security, 6, 66-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0668.2018.6.28118 [in Russian].

Botiakova, V. (2020). Bezposerednii obiekt zlochynu nenadannia dopomohy khvoromu medychnym pratsivnykom [The direct object of the crime is the provision of assistance to the patient by a medical worker]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarvstvo i pravo, Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 2, 265-281. doi: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.2.46 [in Ukrainian].

Chirkov, A.P. (2009). Normativno-pravovoe predpisanie: obshcheteoreticheskiy i ugolovno-pravovoy aspekty [Legal regulations: general theoretical and criminal law aspects]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, Bulletin of the Russian State University I. Kant, 9, 33-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.5922/2223-2095-2009-9-4 [in Russian].

Chub, I.M. (2012). Systematyzatsiia zlochyniv proty avtorytetu orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady, orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia ta obiednan hromadian. [Systematization of crimes against authority of state authorities, local self-government bodies and associations of citizens]. Problemy zakonnosti, Legal issues, 118, 270-77 [in Ukrainian].

Diachkin, O.P. (2009). Kryminalno-pravova okhorona obiektiv elektroenerhetyky ta zviazku [Criminal-law protection of power and communication facilities]. Candidate's thesis. Dnipropetrovsk [in Ukrainian].

Freudenthal, K. (1960). Legal Regulation. Social Work, 5(2), 125-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/5.2.125-a.

Grin, I.Yu. (2018). Legal regulation and ranges of international legal aid in criminal matters. Juridical sciences and education, 57. doi: 10.25108/2304-1730-1749.iolr.2018.57.43-59.

Khavroniuk, M.I. (2007). Kryminalne zakonodavstvo Ukrainy ta inshykh derzhav kontynentalnoi Yevropy: porivnialnyi analiz, problemy harmonizatsii [Criminal legislation of Ukraine and other states of continental Europe: comparative analysis, problems of harmonization]. Doctor's thesis. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

Matyshevskiy, P.S. (1996). Prestupleniia protiv sobstvennosti i smezhnye s nimi prestupleniia: nauchno-prakticheskoe izdanie [Crimes against property and related crimes: research and practice publication]. Kiev: Iurinkom [in Russian].

Nail, A.R. (1996). Prestupleniia protiv sobstvennosti po ugolovnomu pravu Iordanii [Crimes against property under the criminal law of Jordan]. Amman: Dar al Fakir [in Ukrainian].

Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation Legal Form and Economic Theory. Hart Publishing. doi: 10.5040/9781472559647.ch-005.

Osadchyi, V.I. (2004). Kryminalno-pravovyi zakhyst pravookhoronnoi diialnosti [Criminal defense of law enforcement activities]. Kyiv: Atika [in Ukrainian].

Panko, K.K. (2014). Pravila i priemy rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonotvorchestva [Rules and Techniques of Russian Criminal Lawmaking]. Russkii zakon, Lex Russica, 3, 294-304. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/1729-5920.2014.3.9702 [in Russian].

Stashys, V.V., & Tatsii, V.Ya. (2009). Kontseptualni polozhennia i systema chynnoho Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Conceptual provisions and system of current Criminal Code of Ukraine]. Problemy zakonnosti, Legal issues, 100, 278-290 [in Ukrainian].

Summers, S., Schwarzenegger, C., Ege, G., & Young, F. (2014). The Emergence of EU Criminal Law Cybercrime and the Regulation of the Information Society. Hart. doi: 10.5040/9781474201872.ch-005.

Tarusina, N.N. (2014). Rossiiskoe semeynoe zakonodatelstvo: osnovnye tendentsii razvitiia [Russian family legislation: main trends of development]. Russkiy zakon, Lex Russica, 3, 314-323. doi: 10.7256/1729-5920.2014.3.9683

[in Russian].

Trofimov, V.V. (2013). Rossiyskoe konstitutsionnoe zakonodatelstvo i ego konstituiruiushchaia rol v voprose sozdaniia i privedeniia v deistvie pravoobrazovatelnogo mekhanizma gosudarstva [Russian constitutional legislation and its constitutive role in the issue of creating and actuating the law-forming mechanism of the state]. Pravo i politika, Right and politics, 13(168), 1770-1778. doi: https://doi.org/10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.9872 [in Russian].

Tykhyi, V.P. (2010). Zlochyny proty hromadskoi bezpeky [Crimes against public safety]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy "Pro telekomunikatsii": vid 11 lystop. 2003 r. No. 1280-IV [Law of Ukraine "On telecommunications" from November 11, 2003, No. 1280-IV]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/1280-15 [in Ukrainian].


Abstract views: 230
PDF Downloads: 150
Published
2020-09-01
How to Cite
[1]
Babanina , V. and Yurikov , O. 2020. Object of Intentional Damage to Communications Lines (Article 360 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Scientific Herald of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 115, 2 (Sep. 2020), 86-93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33270/01201152.86.
Section
Theoretical and practical aspects of legal science