Periodization of the Criminalistics: Problems of Terminology and Definition of Criterias
Keywords:
time, stage, phase, periodization, criminalistics, forensic knowledge
Abstract
The article substantiates that criminology dates back to ancient times, when in crime detection were used abilities, skills and knowledge of different kinds of crafts, medicine and science. This should be considered as a starting time of criminalistics periodization. A major part of the scientific works of the first half of the XX century contains periodization of criminalistics, starting from the formation of the Soviet republics and their association in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The author argues about the fallacy of such periodization. Criteria of criminalistics periodization contained in scientific sources are generalized: the first group – the events associated with the general course of the history of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and law enforcement – investigative units, expert institutions, forensic research institutions; the second group – outstanding milestones in the development of forensic science (formation of the components of the general theory of criminalistics); the third group – state changes in the sphere of use of specialized knowledge in law enforcement practices which were fixed in the regulations. The vast majority of scientists share the development of forensic criminalistics in stages. The author proves the fallacy of this approach and proposes to use the division into periods and stages as parts of the period in the periodization of the criminalistics. It is also proved that criminalistics in the commission of its periodization is presented as a cumulative process that combines practical activities to solve crimes and relevant scientific statements that reflect the system of forensic knowledge. The author singles out in the development of criminalistics three periods: the first – from the beginning of using knowledge of different types of crafts, medicine and science to the late XIX century; the second – from the late XIX century (when the knowledge of the means and methods of crime detection was systemized) to the middle of XX century; third – from the middle of XX century (the general subject of criminalistics was defined and the general theory of criminalistics was formed) to the present time. As an important criterion for periodization of criminalistics should be considered a definition of the most important and promising areas, trends and tendencies of its development, an identification of regular forensic events and processes that marked the beginning of a new period.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 130 PDF Downloads: 174
How to Cite
[1]
Yusupov, V. 1. Periodization of the Criminalistics: Problems of Terminology and Definition of Criterias. Law Magazine of the National Academy of Internal Affairs. 12, 2 (1), 199-209.
Issue
Section
Theoretical and historical aspects of legal science
Copyright (c) 2017 Law Magazine of the National Academy of Internal Affairs

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.