WORK AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL AND LEGAL TOOL FOR THE RE-SOCIALIZATION OF CONVICTS

Abstract

Abstract. The relevance of the study is determined by the lack of a unified approach in science to the involvement of convicts in labor in prisons, as well as by legislative inconsistencies in the issue of re-education of convicts through occupational therapy. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights regards work as a right that requires consent. Ukrainian legislation also establishes the right to free choice of work and freedom of labor, which, at the same time, does not take into account the legal status of special subjects, such as convicts. The Constitution prohibits the use of forced labor. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has a different legal position, stipulating that military and alternative service, as well as work performed by a person under a court order, cannot be considered forced labor. Legal guarantees for the realization of the right to work are regulated by labor, criminal, and administrative legislation, etc. In particular, the principles of engagement in labor are enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and protected by the relevant provisions of the Criminal Executive Code (CEC) of Ukraine, the Labor Code (LC) of Ukraine, other laws and regulations on labor protection and remuneration, such as the Minimum Standard Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, the Instruction on Working Conditions and Remuneration of Persons Sentenced to Restraint or Imprisonment, etc. To better understand the importance of work as a socio-psychological factor of resocialization in penitentiary institutions, we conducted a study by interviewing and questioning persons serving sentences in prisons. To analyze the work done, we used the method of experiment, statistical method, method of synthesis and analysis, dialectical method, method of abstraction, questionnaire method, observation method, and interview method. The study was conducted in 2021 on the basis of the State Institution "Kyiv Pre-trial Detention Center". As a result of the study, 50 convicts were interviewed (which we consider to be 100 %) and conclusions were drawn based on the statistical method and the method of mathematical proportion.

 

Keywords: labor rights; work of convicts; psychology of work; penitentiary system; resocialization of convicts; social and legal aspect of work; psychological portrait of a criminal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yuliya SAGAIDAK

PhD in Law, Associate Professor

Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Becker, G. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169.

Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and Monopoly Capital.

Brookes, E. (2023). Cesare Lombroso: Theory Of Crime, Criminal Man, And Atavism. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/lombroso-theory-of-crime-criminal-man-and-atavism.html

Ferri, E. (1905). Criminal Sociology. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/ferri/criminal-sociology/index.htm

Fitsula, M. (2002) Pedagogy. Kyiv: Academy. Retrieved from https://studfile.net/preview/5512545/

Gizicki, W., & Warminska, A. (2024). Society’s securitu in Poland in the context of multidisciplinary resocialization solutions after 1989. Selected issues. Transformacje, 2(121), 49-64. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387098487_SOCIETY'S_SECURITY_IN_POLAND_IN_THE_CONTEXT_OF_MULTIDISCIPLINARY_RESOCIALIZATION_SOLUTIONS_AFTER_1989_SELECTED_ISSUES

Katsavets, R. (2022). Criminal psychology (2nd, ed.). Kyiv: Alerta.

Krestovska, N. (2021). Organizational and legal foundations of resocialization of minors in conflict with the law: the experience of Poland. Bulletin of the Penitentiary Association of Ukraine, 1, 5-20. DOI: 10.34015/2523-4552.2021.1.01

Lombrozo, Ch. (2016). Criminal person. (Trans). Duke University Press.

Mandevil, B. (1974) The Sleepy Hive, or Scammers Who Became Honest.

Radov, H. (1997). The role and place of the penitentiary system in the structure of public administration of Ukraine. Problems of penitentiary theory and practice, 1(2), 5-10.

Sahaidak, Yu. (2023). Resocialization of Convicts. National Practice and Foreign Experience. Kyiv Journal of Law, 4, 253-261. DOI: 10.32782/klj/2022.4.3

Shepitko, V. (2014). Criminal Psychology. Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine: electronic version. I. Dziuba (Eds.). Retrieved from https://esu.com.ua/search_articles.php?id=1044

Shepitko, V.u. (2021). Criminal Psychology: History of Formation and Current State. Legal Psychology, 1(28), 14-20. DOI: 10.33270/03212801.14

Suduł, R. (2022). The Penitentiary System in Ensuring Security in Poland. Studia i Analizy Nauk o Polityce, 2, 131-52. DOI: 10.31743/sanp.14410.12991

Sukhomlynskyi, V. (1969). Selected Works. (Lov. 3: Heart of the Children). Kyiv: Rad.school.

Ushynskyi, K. (1952). Work in its mental and educational significance. (Vol. 5), (pp. 387-395). Kyiv: Soviet school. Retrieved from http://catalog.library.tnpu.edu.ua:8080/library/DocDescription? doc_id=72756


Abstract views: 21
PDF Downloads: 38
Published
2025-10-08
Section
Статті