Features of Using Special Forensic Knowledge in the Investigation of Criminal Offenses on Hot Pursuit: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Abstract. The article examines the theoretical and practical aspects of using specialized forensic knowledge in the investigation of criminal offenses under hot pursuit conditions. It demonstrates that the involvement of specialists with scientific, technical knowledge and practical skills allows for verifying the reliability of primary information, confirming or refuting investigative hypotheses, and systematically structuring analysis results. The study addresses legal, tactical, and organizational issues in the effective use of specialized knowledge, including the clear definition of the roles of experts and specialists, the procedure for their engagement, and the documentation of their activities, which minimizes the risk of evidence being deemed inadmissible. Particular attention is given to the application of the OODA cycle (Observe – Orient – Decide – Act) for operational decision-making in dynamic conditions, enhancing situational awareness and the efficiency of investigators and analysts at the crime scene, including the assessment of hot evidence stability and prioritization of its collection. The article analyzes categories of hot evidence by stability (transient, semi-stable, relatively stable), their physical, chemical, biological, and situational nature, as well as collection specifics, including digital traces, which are considered relatively stable and require proper preservation to ensure evidentiary value. The role of the forensic specialist in providing technical-forensic support during investigations, collecting and analyzing evidence on-site, and interacting with criminal analysis units is highlighted, enabling a prompt and comprehensive response at the crime scene. It is emphasized that the effectiveness of investigations under hot pursuit conditions depends on the integration of scientific knowledge, practical skills, tactical actions, and procedural certainty, ensuring timely and correct application of specialized knowledge in criminal proceedings and contributing to the formation of a logically substantiated evidentiary base.

 

Keywords: forensic knowledge; forensic specialist; hot evidence; OODA cycle; digital traces; investigation; evidentiary information; criminal analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antoniuk, P.Ye., & Kondratiev, I.M. (2025). Special knowledge in legal proceedings: A gnoseological aspect. Forensic Bulletin, 1(43), 21-32. DOI: 10.37025/1992-4437/2025-43-1-21

Cherdyntsev, Yu.H., & Samoilenko, O.A. (2022). Issues of recognizing electronic (digital) documents as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings. Forensics and forensics, 67, 169-177. DOI: 10.33994/kndise.2022.67.19

Chychyrkin, A.O. (2021). Interaction of an investigator with expert units in the investigation of traffic safety violations or transport operation offenses. Candidate's thesis. Kyiv.

Kyiv Research Forensic Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraineю (2023). Peculiarities of appointment and possibilities of forensic ballistic examination. Retrieved from https://ndekc.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Балістична-експертиза_.docx.pdf

Martire, K.A. (et al.). (2024). Understanding «error» in the forensic sciences: A primer. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470

Pcholkin, V.D., & Muradli, Sh.I. (2023). Application of specialized knowledge in the investigation of criminal offenses committed in the field of consumer goods production. Bulletin of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 101(2), 1, 236-247. DOI: 10.32631/v.2023.2.22

Pearson, D. (2019). Shift briefing series: How the OODA loop improves decision-making. Patrol Issues. Retrieved from https://www.police1.com/patrol-issues/articles/shift-briefing-series-how-the-ooda-loop-improves-decision-making-L8JE05Ih3xyQjawq/

Shcherbakovskyi, M.H. (2015). Conduct and use of forensic examinations in criminal proceedings. Kharkiv: V dele.

Tarasenko, O., Shevchishen, A., Yermakov, Y., Mirkovets, D., & Diakin, Y. (2021). Use of intelligence tools during pre-trial investigation (Використання інструментарію оперативно-розшукової діяльності у процесі досудового розслідування). Amazonia Investiga, 10(45), 105-112. DOI: 10.34069/AI/2021.45.09.11

Tarasenko, O.S. (2019). Peculiarities of conducting an inspection during the investigation of crimes related to illegal content on the Internet. Legal science, 12(2), 127-135. Retrieved from https://journal-nam.com.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/19/29

Teplytskyi, B.B. (2021). Technical and forensic support for the investigation of crimes in the field of use of electronic computing machines (computers), systems, and computer networks and telecommunication networks. Candidate's thesis. Kyiv.

Tymchyshyn, A.M. (2023a). Peculiarities of using special knowledge during pre-trial investigation. New Ukrainian law, 2, 176-184. DOI: 10.51989/NUL.2023.2.24

Tymchyshyn, A.M. (2023b). Special knowledge in the criminal process of Ukraine: Theory and practice. Doctor's thesis. Kropyvnytskyi.

Yusupov, V.V. (2023). Special knowledge in criminal proceedings and in other types of judicial processes. Legal scientific electronic journal, 3, 486-490. DOI: 10.32782/2524-0374/2023-3/111


Abstract views: 4
PDF Downloads: 3
Published
2026-03-31
Section
Статті