Organization of the Investigation of Crimes Against Justice Committed by Professional Participants of the Judicial Proceedings

  • Yevhen SUP PhD in Law, Doctoral Student of the National Scientific Center «Honor Professor M.S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute», Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6912-2157
  • Yevhenii ZOZULIA Lecturer of the Department of Criminalistics, Forensic Science and Pre-Medical Care of the Kharkov National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-0408

Abstract

Abstract. The article presents a comprehensive theoretical and applied study of the features of the organization of the pre-trial investigation of crimes against justice committed by professional participants of the judicial proceedings. The forensically significant features of this category of criminal offenses are highlighted, including the special subject, the intellectual and documentary methods of commission, the increased level of latency, and active opposition to the investigation. The characteristic features of the mechanism of criminal activity and the trace picture, in which procedural documents and digital data dominate, are summarized, along with the need for an enhanced analytical component of proof and for logical and legal verification of formally lawful decisions for their illegal orientation. It is substantiated that the planning and organization of the investigation in such proceedings are of great importance, ensuring the manageability of the evidentiary process, the rational allocation of resources, compliance with reasonable deadlines, and the procedural stability of the obtained results. The article presents a multi-level model of investigation organization, combining the general system, management, methodological and tactical levels, and determines their practical significance for neutralizing the professional opposition of a special subject. The role of the prosecutor's office as a subject not only of procedural management but also of ensuring the legitimacy and impartiality of the investigation in the presence of risks of conflict of interest and corporate solidarity is outlined. Key organizational priorities that should be followed during the investigation are identified: specialization of investigators and formation of stable investigative groups; restriction of access to materials; strengthening of information security; analytical support; standardization of procedures for accounting, movement and storage of materials; effective interaction with operational-technical and expert units; internal quality control and deadlines.

 

Keywords: criminal justice; law enforcement agency; pre-trial investigation; prosecution; principle of organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alieksieieva, N.Yu. (2017). Criminal responsibility for crimes against justice, committed by witnesses, experts, interpreters or in respect of them. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/handle/1234567890/3501

Bernaz, V.D. (2012). Even organizations investigation of crimes in strategy of per-trial investigation. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Series "Jurisprudence", 3, 136-140. Retrieved from https://vestnik-pravo.mgu.od.ua/archive/juspradenc3/24.pdf

Borusovskyi, M.V. (2021). Fundamentals of investigation technique of abuse of power or official position judges during justice execution. Candidate’s thesis. Lviv. Retrieved from https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/3734/1/boruusovskiy_d.pdf

Hrytsenko, V.V. (2024). Forensic classification of criminal offenses against justice. Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, 33(3), 256-266. DOI: 10.32631/vca.2024.3.22

Husieva, V.O., & Romanauskas, K.A. (2025). Mechanism of committing crimes in the field of professional legal assistance. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 110(3), 131-140. DOI: 10.32631/v.2025.03.11

Khrystova, Yu. (2022). Criminal law counteraction to criminal offenses against justice: Modern challenges. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 2(121), 328-332. DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2022-6-333-341

Knyzhenko, S.O. (2017). Investigation of crimes committed by law enforcement officials through violation of the procedure for administering or ensuring justice. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University, 30(2), 94-97. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhnuvs_2015_2_13

Mykytiuk, S. V. (2024). Procedural activity of the investigator of the State Bureau of Investigation in criminal proceedings. Doctor's thesis. Chernihiv. Retrieved from https://dspace.pau.edu.ua/ handle/123456789/903

Romanauskas, K.A. (2024). Fundamentals of methods for investigating knowingly false testimony by a witness and a victim. V.O. Husieva (Eds.). Kharkiv.

Shepitko, M.V. (2018). Theoretical and methodological foundations for forming a system of counteraction to crimes in the field of justice. Extended abstract of Doctor's thesis. Kharkiv. Retrieved from https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/15385

Shepitko, M.V. (2020). Criminal legislation trends in Ukraine (evidence from crimes against justice). Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(2), 174-189. DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.27(2).2020.131-141

Shnypko, O.S. (2017). Criminal law study of the crime of knowingly unlawful detention, apprehension, house arrest or custody (Art. 371 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0418U003203

Sup, Ye.Yu. (2025). Forensic characteristics of criminal offences against justice committed by professional participants in legal proceedings. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, 108(1), 1, 365-375. DOI: 10.32631/v.2025.1.30.

Timofieieva, L.Yu. (2022). Criminal offenses against justice and practice European Court of Human Right. Law and Public Administration, 2, 141-146. DOI: 10.32840/pdu.2022.2.19

Vorontsov, A.V. (2011). Criminal liability for crimes against justice committed by officials of inquiry and pre-trial investigation bodies. Candidate’s thesis. Odesa.

Zatolochnyi, V.S. (2022). Criminal Liability for Apprehension, Detention, House Arrest and Remand Known to Be Illegal. Candidate’s thesis. Lviv. Retrieved from https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/ files/2022/dissertation/20826/diszatolochniyvs.pdf


Abstract views: 11
PDF Downloads: 7
Published
2026-03-31
Section
Статті